thp 1 dual cells (InvivoGen)
Structured Review

Thp 1 Dual Cells, supplied by InvivoGen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 635 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/thp 1 dual cells/product/InvivoGen
Average 96 stars, based on 635 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Suppression of interferon signaling via small-molecule modulation of TFAM"
Article Title: Suppression of interferon signaling via small-molecule modulation of TFAM
Journal: eLife
doi: 10.7554/eLife.108742
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Flowchart of the CXCL-10 experiment. ( B ) Compounds 2 , 3 , and 15 repressed ISG signaling in CXCL-10 production. THP-1 cells were pre-treated with individual compounds 48 h prior to 100 ng/mL TNFa stimulation for 48 h. CXCL-10 levels were measured. ( C ) Flowchart of the ISRE experiment. ( D ) Compounds 2 , 3 , and 15 repressed ISG signaling in IRF3 production. THP-1-Dual cells were pre-treated with individual compounds 24 h prior to 100 ng/mL TNFa stimulation for 48 h. The inhibition of type I IFN response was monitored via ISRE reporter activation. Figures are representatives of at least two independent experiments. Graph shows one representative experiment of two independent experiments. Error bars represent ± SD from n=3 biological replicates. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. Source data for this figure are available in (raw data and analysis). Figure 2—source data 1. Raw data and analysis results to generate the graphs shown in .
Techniques Used: Inhibition, Activation Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Chemical structures of hit compounds and related analogs. ( B ) TFAM modulators were profiled in the ISRE assay and display dose-dependent suppression of ISG signaling. THP-1-Dual cells were pre-treated with individual compounds 24 h prior to 100 ng/mL TNFa stimulation for 48 h. ISRE reporter activation was measured. Figures are representatives of at least two independent experiments. Graph shows one representative experiment of two independent experiments. Error bars represent ± SD from n=3 biological replicates. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. Source data for this figure are available in (raw data and analysis). Figure 3—source data 1. Raw data and analysis results to generate the graphs shown in .
Techniques Used: Activation Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) ISRE reporter activation of THP-1 dual cells stimulated with 100 ng/mL TNFa for 48 h. Compounds were added to the cells 5 min before the assay detection. Figures are representatives of at least two independent experiments. Graph shows one representative experiment of two independent experiments. Error bars represent ± SD from n=3 biological replicates. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. Source data for this figure are available in (raw data and analysis).
Techniques Used: Activation Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Compounds 2 , 3 , and 15 do not repress cGAMP induced ISG signaling. THP-1-Dual cells were pre-treated with individual compounds 48 h prior to 10 ug/mL cGAMP stimulation for 24 h. ISRE reporter activation was measured. ( B ) Compounds 2 , 3 , and 11 impart a dose-dependent increase in TFAM protein levels. Immunoblot analysis of TFAM from T47D cells treated with indicated compounds for 5 days. ( C ) Compounds exhibit minimal impact on TFAM mRNA levels. ( D ) Downregulation of TFAM attenuates the function of compounds 2 and 3 in repression of ISG signaling. THP-1-Dual cells were treated with individual compounds 24 h after siRNA transfection. After incubation for 24 h, THP-1-Dual cells were stimulated with 100 ng/mL TNFa for another 48 h. ISRE reporter activation was measured and normalized to protein concentration. ( E ) Compound 3 inhibits mtDNA cytosolic leakage. THP-1 cells were pre-treated with individual compounds 72 h prior to 100 ng/mL TNFa stimulation for 48 h. Cytosolic mtDNA was extracted and quantified using a qPCR assay. Figures are representatives of at least two independent experiments. Graph shows one representative experiment of two independent experiments. Error bars represent ± SD from n=3 biological replicates. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. Source data for this figure are available in (original uncropped blots) and (annotated uncropped blots), and (raw data and analysis). Figure 4—source data 1. Original uncropped western blot images for . Figure 4—source data 2. Annotated uncropped western blot images for , with treatment conditions and protein identities indicated. Figure 4—source data 3. Raw data and analysis results to generate the graphs shown in .
Techniques Used: Activation Assay, Western Blot, Transfection, Incubation, Protein Concentration


![Ecotypes and cell‒cell communication networks in skin tumour microenvironment. (A) Heatmap showing the five ecotypes of skin tumours, which were inferred based on tumour microenvironment cell compositions. Bar plot showing the distribution of various cell lineages in each sample. (B) Pie charts showing ecotype distribution across tumour types and stages. (C) Pie charts showing tumour‐stage compositions across ecotypes. (D) Bar plots of enriched ligand‒receptor interactions for ecotype 1 and ecotype 4. (E) Cell‒cell communication networks showing MHC‐I signalling interactions in ecotype 1 and ecotype 4 (top) and SPP1 signalling interactions in ecotype 1 and ecotype 4 (bottom). Edge thickness indicates interaction strength, and colours represent different cell lineages. (F) Violin plots showing the expression of HLA‐A (top) and SPP1 (bottom) with associated partner genes (CD8A, CD44) across cell types and ecotypes. (G) qRT‐PCR showing Spp1 expression in RAW264.7 macrophages cultured with conditioned medium from B16 melanoma cells. (H) Western blot showing Spp1 protein levels in tumour‐associated macrophages (TAMs) after B16‐conditioned medium treatment, with corresponding quantification. (I) qRT‐PCR showing M2 polarisation markers expression in RAW264.7 macrophages after B16‐conditioned medium treatment. (J) qRT‐PCR showing SPP1 mRNA expression <t>in</t> <t>THP‐1</t> macrophages transduced with control short hairpin RNA (shRNA) (negative control shRNA [shNC]) or two independent SPP1 ‐targeting shRNAs (shSPP1‐1# and shSPP1‐2#) (K) Western blot showing SPP1 protein levels in shNC, sh SPP1 ‐1# and sh SPP1 ‐2# THP‐1 cells. (L) M2 polarisation markers ( ARG‐1 , MRC1 and CD163) were measured in shNC or sh SPP1 THP‐1 macrophages cultured with SK‐MEL‐28‐conditioned medium. (M) qRT‐PCR showing SPP1 mRNA expression in THP‐1 macrophages transduced with empty vector (EV) or SPP1 overexpression construct (SPP1‐OE). (N) Western blot showing SPP1 protein levels in EV and SPP1 ‐OE THP‐1 cells. (O) M2 polarisation markers ( ARG‐1 , MRC1 and CD163 ) were measured in EV/ SPP1 ‐OE THP‐1 macrophages cultured with SK‐MEL‐28‐conditioned medium. Data are presented as mean ± SD. n = 3 independent repeats. Unpaired, two‐tailed t ‐test; * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001, **** p < .0001.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_9349/pmc12869349/pmc12869349__CTM2-16-e70611-g001.jpg)
